Legal Opinion

Farmers' State Bank of Florence v. Cottingham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1924No. 6693PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

BLAIR, J.

This suit was instituted by appellant bank seeking to recover on a note for the sum of $833.75, executed jointly by W. F. Cottingham and by John Green' & Sons, a copartnership composed of John Green, Jesse Green, and Oily Green, and made payable to appellant.

Appellees John Green & Sons, filed an answer, consisting of numerous defenses to the note in suit, but only two of them were submitted to the jury or taken into considera-’ tion by the court in rendering judgment. One of appellees John Green & Sons’ defenses was that at the time of the execution of the note appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HarriettTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Burke v. CrugerTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Hall v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Wylie v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. First State Bank of Amarillo v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Wright Titus, Inc. v. SwaffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Forreston Gin Co. v. Waxahachie Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Moore v. B. & M. Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. BreyfogleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API