Stennett v. Dawsey

¶12. I disagree with the majority’s finding in this case, and I respectfully dissent. I submit that a material change in circumstances was established by Daw-sey’s admitted illegal use of methamphetamine and her need for three months of inpatient preventative care for substance abuse in June 2010. I note that Dawsey’s three months of drug rehabilitation prompted Stennett’s emergency motion for custody in this case. The chancellor thus erred in failing to find that a material change of circumstances adversely affecting Dawsey and Stennett’s two children had occurred since, the initial custody…