Gamet v. Beazley
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Blume, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages sustained by him in a rear-end collision. Plaintiff’s automobile, while traveling westward, struck the automobile of the defendents which was standing still on the road. The court found in favor of the defendents and plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff was severely injured. In view of our conclusion herein, however, it is unnecessary to set forth the evidence as to the extent of his injury, or as to what damages he sustained. Aside from that, the testimony is, in brief, as follows:
Both cars wre traveling westward.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Caulder Ex Rel. Townsend v. GreshamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Drum v. DinkelackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Goodman v. WisbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Pierce v. BeanWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Palmeno v. CashenWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Runnion v. KittsWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Templar v. TongateWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- McDowall v. WaltersWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Porter v. WilsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.