Legal Opinion

Caron v. Bruno

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 9, 1986No. CA-5109Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

LOBRANO, Judge.

We granted rehearing in this matter to reconsider our original holding that the lessee was an indispensable party to these proceedings. After careful consideration, we conclude we were in error. Our original opinion accurately sets forth the facts of this case.

Article 641 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides:

“Indispensable parties to an action are those whose interests in the subject matter are so interrelated, and would be so directly affected by the judgment, that a complete and equitable adjudication of the controversy cannot be made unless they are joined in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Raftery Elevator Corp. v. MaloneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API