Legal Opinion
Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 20, 1993No. 92-2134PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Because the appeals referee’s determination that the appellant was laid off due to lack of work was supported by competent evidence, it was unjustifiably reversed by the Unemployment Appeals Commission on the basis of its own finding that she voluntarily quit. Iglesias v. Eagle Nat’l Bank of Miami, 598 So.2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). Accordingly, the order below is reversed with directions to afford Cheung the unemployment benefits claimed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Iglesias v. Eagle National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cheung v. Executive China Doral, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Seifried v. Shell Lumber & Hardware CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993