Rogers v. Hœnig
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Chippewa County. Beplevin. After a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, the court made an order vacating the judgment and granting a new trial. Erom this order the plaintiff appealed. The errors alleged by the appellant, so far as passed upon by this court, will sufficiently appear from the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtOeton, J.
"Without considering the merits of the motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial in this action, upon which the order of the circuit court was made, and from which this appeal is taken, there appear to be two objections, either of which is fatal to this order.
First. A motion for the same purpose, and founded siib-stantially upon the same grounds, had been denied, and the matters of such motion had become res adjvdicata. Second Ward Bank v. Upman et al., 14 Wis., 596; Cothren v. Connaughton, 24 Wis., 134; Kabe v. The Vessel “Eagle” et al., 25 Wis., 108. The judge of the circuit court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cothren v. ConnaughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Second Ward Bank v. UpmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Walker v. RoganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Attorney General ex rel. Cushing v. LumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
- Hill v. HooverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. HornerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Lookabaugh v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Luke v. ColemanUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Kappel v. MethSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.