Legal Opinion

Cutera, Inc. v. Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 3, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00235Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Cutera, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00235-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Lutronic Aesthetics, Inc. 1S Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Cutera, Inc. requests reconsideration of the denial of its motion to amend the 18 | complaint to add Lutronic Corporation as a defendant. Mot., ECF No. 82. The plaintiff argues 19 | the court erred by relying on Rule 16(b) instead of Rule 15 to deny the motion. Jd. at 3.! 20 | Lutronic opposes the motion, see Opp’n, ECF No. 84, and Cutera replied, see Reply, ECF No. 86. 21 | The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Santa Monica BayKeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Southwest MarineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Meyer, Wilson & Co. v. Thompson, De Hart & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API