Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Niichels

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1930No. 5252PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

— Respondent brought two separate actions against appellants; the first alleged in substance that appellants, as lessees from respondent, had breached the terms of a crop share lease of farm lands in certain designated particulars, and that appellants unless restrained would sell and incumber the crop for the year involved, in which crop respondent by reason of the lease claimed an interest; also claimed by reason of the breach of the lease the right to repossession of the premises, asked for a receiver, damages because of depreciation in and loss of crop, and his share of the crop grown.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Christensen v. HollingsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Portneuf Irrigating Co. v. BudgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Burke Land & Livestock Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1900
  5. In re DawsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Comish v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. David Steed & Associates, Inc. v. YoungIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fogelstrom v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Nuquist v. BauscherIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API