Legal Opinion

Tamposi v. Denby

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 23, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-12283-RBCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE SHELTON CLAIMANTS’ MOTION FOR THE ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INIUNCTION, ETC. (#107)

COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

On December 12, 2013, plaintiffs Julie Shelton (hereinafter individually “Shelton”), Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd, LLP and Faegre Baker Daniels LLP (hereinafter collectively “the Shelton Claimants”) filed a motion (# 107) pursuant to Rule 65, Fed.R.Civ.P., seeking the entry of a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction freezing five million dollars ($5,000,000.00) in assets of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. First National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. McCrory v. Spigel (In Re Spigel)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Faville v. MunroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API