Ridgely National Bank v. Fairbank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Assumpsit on promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
This was an action of assumpsit. The course of the pleadings was as follows:
The original declaration filed consisted of the common counts, only, with an affidavit of claim. To this the defendant pleaded the general issue with an affidavit of merits. .Plaintiff, after leave obtained, filed an amended declaration consisting of special counts on a promissory note, and common counts, which amended narr. was stricken from the files on motion of the defendants, on October 13, 1893. Plaintiff on that date obtained leave to file a second amended declaration within one day, and at the same time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wright v. the Lessee of HollingsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- McAllister v. BallIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Williams v. Miami Powder Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890
- Johnson v. GloverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Lehman v. SiggemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gettings v. BuchananMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Harris v. JuengerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Pease v. BartlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Chicago Architectural Iron Works v. McKeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
- Dubois v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.