King v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery by assault, and punishment, enhanced under the provisions of Article 62, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., was assessed at imprisonment for life. The sole contention on appeal is that forgery, the prior conviction with which the sentence was enhanced, is not and was not proved to be an offense “of the same nature” as robbery by assault.
Article 62, V.A.P.C., provides:
“If it be shown on the trial of a felony less than capital that the defendant has been before convicted of the same offense, or one of the same nature, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Kanaziz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Warner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Schmeideberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ex parte RopolloCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.