Legal Opinion

Town of New Pekin, Indiana v. Gail Stewart and Kermit Stewart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2014No. 88A01-1310-PL-442Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res May 23 2014, 9:58 am judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: MICHAEL R. MOROW P. MICHAEL SUMMERS Stephenson Morow & Semler The Summers Law Office Indianapolis, Indiana New Albany, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA TOWN OF NEW PEKIN, INDIANA, ) ) Appellant-Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No. 88A01-1310-PL-442 ) GAIL STEWART and KERMIT STEWART, ) )…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ChristieIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. McClaskey v. McDanielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Lagro Township and Karen Pinkerton Tatro v. George E. Bitzer and Zelma E. BitzerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API