Legal Opinion

Macerich Queens Ltd. Partnership v. M.I.E. Hospitality, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 11, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernice D. Siegal, J.

The petitioner Macerich Queens Limited Partnership (here*277inafter Macerich) commenced, the instant commercial holdover summary proceeding against respondent M.I.E. Hospitality, Inc. (hereinafter M.I.E.) seeking to recover possession of certain commercial premises located in Elmhurst and a money judgment for claimed rental arrears and use and occupancy accrued from September 2000. Upon M.I.E.’s failure to appear for trial on January 30, 2002, an inquest was held before this court.

At the inquest, the court found the relevant facts to be as follows:

M.I.E.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Lakeside Concrete Corp. v. Pine Hollow Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Oppenheim v. SpikeNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Fleming v. FlanaganJustice Court of Town of Ramapo · 1998
  5. Touhamy v. GeraldoNassau County District Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dolan v. LinnenCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. Avgush v. BerrahuAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  3. Ressa Family, LLC v. DorfmanNassau County District Court · 2002
  4. Expressway Village, Inc. v. Denman, New York County Courts2009
  5. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. 1949 Food Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API