Legal Opinion

S. & J. Mercury Cab v. Eibister

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 27, 1964No. Nos. 33140, 33230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

By petition for a writ of certiorari and cross petition for certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 25, 1963.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ.,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Carroll Daniel Fisher Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. S. & J. Mercury Cab v. EibisterSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API