Mitchell v. Cotten
Supreme Court of Florida
Writ of Error to Leon Circuit Court, where this cause had been tried before Judge Baltzell. The facts fully appear in the opinion of the Chief Justice.
1Opinion of the Court
Douglas, Chief Justice:
This is an action of assumpit instituted by the plaintiff in error in the Loon Circuit Court against the defendant in error as executor, &c., of John W. Cotten, deceased, to recover the sum (alleged to be) due upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy, viz:
“ On or before the first day of January next, we or either of us, promise to pay Isaac W. Mitchell, or order, fifteen thousand nine hundred and fifty-fivo dollars, with ten per cent, interest from date, for value received this 2d January, 1841.,
[Signed] H. Doggett,
J. W. Cotten.”
The declaration contains…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Olcott v. RathboneNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Markle v. HatfieldNew York Supreme Court · 1807
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shivery v. StreeperSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- Judge v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1860
- Mitchell v. CottenSupreme Court of Florida · 1850