Legal Opinion

Brice v. Vermeulen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Kevin Vermeulen and Maria Vermeulen appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), *859dated December 30, 2009, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant homeowners failed to demonstrate their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, thereby precluding the granting of their motion for summary judgment. The appellants acknowledged in their respective depositions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Viscusi v. FennerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Hotzoglou v. HotzoglouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Peters v. 1625 East 13th Street Owners, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starr v. HolesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. STARR, JR., JAMES M. v. HOLES, ROGER H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API