Commonwealth v. Neitzel
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
CIRILLO, President Judge Emeritus,
dissenting.
Despite the majority’s comprehensive statutory history of state and federal wildlife statutes, I believe that the appellant’s conviction should have been dismissed, and therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Our court has held that “a citation must include a specific section of the statute violated.” Commonwealth v. Cohen, 413 *15Pa.Super. 460, 463, 605 A.2d 814, 816 (1992) (emphasis added); Commonwealth v. Stahl, 296 Pa.Super. 507, 442 A.2d 1166 (1982). The Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure also state:
(A) Every citation shall contain:(6) a citation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. StahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. FryeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986