Legal Opinion

Northern Lumber Co. v. O'Brien

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOCHREN, District Judge.

This cause came on for final hearing June 15, 1903, upon the bill, the answer of defendants William O’Brien, Albert J. Rammers, and George A. Rammers, and the stipulation of facts on file; the complainant appearing by James B. Kerr, its solicitor, and the answering defendants by J. N. Searles, their solicitor. The defendant Mary E. Coffin, though duly served with the subpoena on the 3d day of January, 1903, has never appeared in the suit, and is in default.

From the admissions in the pleadings and the stipulated facts it appears that by an act of Congress of May 5, 1864…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Samson v. SmileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. FellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API