Legal Opinion

J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 25, 1955No. 59106; protests 223866-K and 229833-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case, consisting of waste pieces of knitted wool fabric, was classified as wool rags under paragraph 1105 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, dutiable at 9 cents per pound.

Plaintiff claims the merchandise is “Waste, not specially provided for,” which falls under paragraph 1555 of the said act and dutiable, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739, at 4 per centum ad valorem.

The case was submitted on a stipulation between counsel for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Protests 112155-K of LobsitzUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. Eisenberg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API