Legal Opinion

Oltarsh v. Oltarsh

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNull, J.

Substantial rights already vested under a decree of this court may be. nullified by the defendant’s impending action in view of the holding in Williams v. North Carolina (317 U. S. 287). Under such circumstances the court may intervene to ward off threatened harm. (Greenberg v. Greenberg, 218 App. Div. 104.)

Nor is the holding in Goldstein v. Goldstein (283 N. Y. 146) determinative of this application. That decision was reached prior to the holding in the Williams case and depended for its authority upon the validity of Haddock v. Haddock (201 *256U. S. 562). Inasmuch as the Williams case has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Goldstein v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Greenberg v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Republic Lodge No. 1987New York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Pereira v. PereiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API