Legal Opinion

Kent Manufacturing Co. v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1910No. 6341PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court — Hon. Hubert L. Shattuck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Appellee, as plaintiff, brought suit against appellant, as defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant. The verdict and judgment was in favor of plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

It is evident from the pleadings and testimony that issues of fact were submitted to the jury for determination which should not have been, and for this reason the judgment of the district court must he reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. It *390is also apparent from an inspection of the complaint that the facts upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Lord v. Pueblo Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Wells v. CoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Colorado Midland R'y Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  5. Burlington & Colorado R. R. v. LieheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Aurora v. LovelessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. LangdonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. Richardson v. El Paso Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc. v. Sandra Lee Neely, by Her Legal Representative and Guardian, Cecile v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Matt Skorey Packard Co. v. CaninoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API