Legal Opinion
Babcock v. . City of Buffalo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1874PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] It being established by the findings of the court at Special Term that it was not necessary for the purpose of abating the alleged nuisance, to fill up the portion of the canal north of Canal street bridge; that such filling up was a serious and unnecessary injury to the plaintiff's property; that the nuisance had been caused by the…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Chenango Bridge Co. v. . PaigeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Eckhardt v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Walther v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.