Legal Opinion

State v. Weigel

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1969No. Cr. 377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErickstad, Judge

(on reassignment).

By information dated February 24, 1967, the defendant, Pius T. Weigel, was charged in the District Court of Morton County with having sold a security while not registered as a* securities dealer or salesman.

Through a similar information Carl Weisser was charged with the same offense, and the two informations were consolidated for trial. The trial resulted in verdicts of guilty, and it is from the judgment and sentence entered upon the verdict finding Mr. Weigel guilty that he now appeals.

The facts essential to our consideration of Mr. Weigel’s contention on this appeal were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Timm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. WeisserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. MooreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Meadow Fresh Farms, Inc. v. SandstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. GatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Ficek v. INTERNATIONAL BRO. OF BOILERMAKERS, ETC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API