Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Gibbs

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. J. K. Johnson, Judge. Action to quiet the title in plaintiff to certain city lots. Upon a trial on the merits there was a decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

— I. The facts, briefly stated, upon which the cause is to be determined, are as follows: One M. B. Sturges, then the undisputed owner of the lots, conveyed them, April 12, 1883, to plaintiff. The deed was not filed for record until March 17, 1885. May 5,. 1883, defendant caused the lots and other property to be attached in an action against W. B. Sturges. In this action M. B. Sturges intervened, claiming all the property attached. Pending this action, a settlement was had between defendant and M. B. Sturges ; and under it all the property attached, except the lots involved in this action,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rush v. FrostSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. First Nat. Bank of Tama City v. HayzlettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. MillimanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Wilson v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Manufacturers' Bottle Co. v. Taylor-Stites Glass Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Grant v. CherrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. Walker v. VandiverTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API