Legal Opinion
Application of Sidney Dilnot
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 28, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals which rejected claims 1, 11-13, 16, 18, 19, 21 and 22 of appellant’s application 1 entitled “Calcium Silicate Hydrate Products” as unpatentable over the prior art.
The initial decision of the board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claim 22, presented for the purpose of interference, but reversed the rejection of the remaining claims on the art relied on by the examiner. The board also rejected those claims on two new grounds, one of which involved reliance on a newly cited reference, under the provisions of Rule…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re KorpiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- Dow Chemical Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Matter of Jerry Wolman and Anne Wolman, Debtors. Jerry Wolman and Anne Wolman v. Leonard H. ToseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Harvey-Whipple, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- In the Matter of Jerry Wolman and Anne Wolman, Debtors. Jerry Wolman and Anne Wolman v. Leonard H. ToseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Nl Industries, Inc. And Baroid Corporation, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Exploration Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990