Legal Opinion

Biltmore Music Corp. v. Kittinger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1956No. 14625PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

This action for infringement of copyright was tried by the court without a jury. In the court below and in the arguments here, the pleadings have been disregarded. There was an agreed statement of facts introduced into the record and upon this alone the cause was decided. Findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment for defendant were entered.

The agreed statement of facts is as follows:

“It Is Hereby Stipulated by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the following statements of fact are true:
“1. The cause of action involved…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosette v. Rainbo Record Manufacturing CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  2. Norbay Music, Inc. v. King Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Norbay Music, Inc. v. King Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. Biltmore Music Corporation v. KittingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API