Legal Opinion

In Re Petersen

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1958No. Crim. 6215Published

1Opinion of the Court

51 Cal.2d 177 (1958)

331 P.2d 24

In re MAGNUS J. PETERSEN, on Habeas Corpus.

Docket No. Crim. 6215.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 31, 1958.

Lewis, Field, DeGoff & Stein and Marvin E. Lewis for Petitioner.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, Thomas C. Lynch, District Attorney (San Francisco), Dion R. Holm, City Attorney (San Francisco), and George E. Baglin, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

Ackerman, Johnston, Johnston & Mathews and Philip S. Mathews as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

GIBSON,…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API