Legal Opinion

Feuerstein v. Feuerstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment (denominated order) unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant’s sole contention is that because plaintiff’s submission of a proposed order was untimely, her motion *908must be deemed abandoned. A prevailing party must provide the court with a proposed order or judgment for signature "unless otherwise directed by the court, within 60 days after the signing and filing of the decision directing that the order be settled or submitted” (22 NYCRR 202.48 [a]). A party’s failure to comply with that section shall be deemed an abandonment unless that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seeman v. SeemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Tuller v. TullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API