Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1998No. 02S01-9611-CR-00102PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The issue in this post-conviction death penalty appeal is whether the jury’s reliance on an invalid aggravating circumstance was harmless error, or whether resentencing is required because there is reasonable doubt that the sentence would have been the same had the jury given no weight to the invalid aggravating factor. The jury relied on a valid aggravating factor, that the defendant had a prior conviction for a violent felony offense (second-degree murder), and an invalid aggravating circumstance, that the victim was killed during the commission of a felony.1

A…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. State v. CazesTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. StevensTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mika'eel Abdullah Abdus-Samad, Formerly Known as Michael J. Boyd v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Sample v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API