Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v. Willsea Works
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this condemnation proceeding, petitioner contends that the trial court erroneously determined that respondent’s building constituted a specialty and thus improperly utilized the summation method of valuation. The irregularly shaped parcel at issue, acquired by petitioner on October 13, 1971 as part of its Upper Falls Urban Renewal Project, is situate at the southwest corner of the intersection of St. Paul and Cataract Streets in the City of Rochester, and consists of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. KiernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- McDonald v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- McDonald v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- City of Glen Cove v. Switzer Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Acquisition of Real Property of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Gorge Terminal Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983