Legal Opinion

Vitacost.com, Inc. v. McCants

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 2017No. 4D16-3384PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

The enforcement of an arbitration clause in an internet sale of dietary supplements is the issue in this appeal. A seller of dietary supplements appeals a non-final order denying its motion to compel arbitration in a products liability action. The issue is whether the terms and conditions located on the seller’s website, which included an arbitration clause, were effectively incorporated into the sales agreement between the plaintiff purchaser and the seller. The trial court concluded that the arbitration clause was not incorporated and denied the seller’s motion to compel arbitration. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Hines v. Overstock. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  4. Hubbert v. Dell Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. In re Zappos.com, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Avis Budget Grp., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  2. Metropcs Communications v. Jorge PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  3. Arencibia v. AGA Service CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  4. Barney v. Grand Caribbean Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
  5. Bell v. Royal Seas Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API