Legal Opinion
Parker v. BALTIMORE PAINT AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 26, 1967No. Civ. A. 8851PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, District Judge.
The defendant Shuford has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based upon his contention that he has been released as a result of the Plaintiff’s having settled with the other defendants and having given a release to them in this same action. The suit is one under Section 10(b) and Rule 10(b) 5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Plaintiff is a Chapter X trustee for the Clute Corporation. The Complaint names as defendants the Baltimore Paint and Chemical Corporation together with four former Directors of the Clute Corporation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Price v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Morris v. DiersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- A & a Sign Company, Inc. v. Rex E. Maughan, Trustee of Mayer Central Building Corporation, a DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- In Re Blehm Land and Cattle Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- In re Medical Sterile ProductsDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1970
- In Re Waikiki Hobron AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1985
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection & Energy v. Heldor Industries, Inc. (In Re Heldor Industries, Inc.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992