Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1967No. 10842_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge.

Whether Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) or New Amsterdam Casualty Company (“New Amsterdam”) could be liable to pay judgments totalling $26,000.00 against Charles A. Bellows for his negligence in an automobile accident is the question to be decided. Bellows was an insured under a policy issued by Nationwide to his mother, having applicable limits of $100,000.00, which contained a provision constituting it excess insurance where other collectible insurance was applicable. Admittedly, Nationwide was liable unless its policy was excess insurance. Bellows’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Collins v. New York Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. United States v. Walter M. DillingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. Dahl William WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  5. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johns Hopkins University v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
  2. Ryan v. FUREYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Mutual of Omaha Insurance v. Ruff ex rel. Estate of BurdickDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  5. Ryan v. FUREYSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API