Legal Opinion
Purex Corp. v. Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union, Local 618
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1983No. 82-1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Purex Corporation appeals from the District Court’s1 denial of its motion for an injunction against a strike at its St. Louis plant. According to Purex, the strike violated the no-strike clause in the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement. We conclude that the District Court, 543 F.Supp. 1011, correctly determined that the collective-bargaining agreement had expired and therefore we affirm.
I
Purex and the Automotive, Petroleum and Allied Industrial Employees Union, Local 618 have been parties to a series of collective-bargaining agreements over a number of years. In…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Rejectors Industries, Etc. v. United Steelworkers of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Purex Corporation v. Automotive, Petroleum And Allied Industries Employees Union, Local 618Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983