Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hancock & Buchanan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 28, 1938No. 4-4997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is the second appeal of this case. The first is reported as Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Hancock, 187 Ark. 1007, 63 S.W.2d 973. The statement made in that first appeal may be taken as a statement in the instant case. There is no real or essential difference except in the instant case the error complained of in the former appeal and upon which it was reversed does not appear.

Hancock testified that he and his traveling companion, Buchanan, were desirous of returning to their homes in Oklahoma and in the railroad yards of North Little Rock, at night, they accosted someone and asked…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kruse v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Reed v. Baldwin, Trustees, Missouri Pac. Ry.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. BleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Williams v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson, Tr. v. HelmertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API