Legal Opinion

The Navemar

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 26, 1938No. 15102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GALSTON, District Judge.

Prior proceedings in this cause bearing on the application of the Spanish Ambassador to intervene and to have the decree of this court, which awarded possession of the Steamship Navemar to the libellant, vacated, are reported in The Navemar, D. C., 17 F.Supp. 647; Id., D.C., 18 F.Supp. 153; Id., 2 Cir., 90 F.2d 673, and in Id., 303 U.S. 68, 58 S.Ct. 432, 82 L.Ed. 667. The opinion of the Supreme Court concludes with the instruction that (page 436):

“The respondent will be permitted to intervene for the purpose of asserting the Spanish government’s ownership and right of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Berizzi Brothers Co. v. SS PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Republic of Mexico v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API