Legal Opinion
Tempforce, Inc. v. Municipal Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lynch, J.), entered October 21, 1994 in Schenectady County, which granted third-party defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint and all cross claims against them.
In 1988 defendant Schenectady Municipal Housing Authority (hereinafter SMHA) decided to replace the roofing system at Yates Village (hereinafter the project), a housing project in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County. SMHA hired third-party defendant Feibes & Schmitt Architects (hereinafter *779F&S) to provide architectural services, defendant McNar…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Board of Education v. Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & FolleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nassau Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Robinson Redevelopment Co. v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trump Village Section 3, Inc. v. New York State Housing Finance AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rothberg v. ReicheltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Westbank Contracting, Inc. v. Rondout Valley Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- McNar Industries, Inc. v. Feibes & Schmitt, ArchitectsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.