In re the Marriage of Slauson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Concurrence
THORNTON, J.,
specially concurring.
While I concur in the result reached by the majority, I do not concur in that portion of the opinion which invalidates the proviso in the trial court’s decree authorizing the wife to request a review of the provision regarding spousal support "at any time without a necessity of showing a substantial change of circumstances.”
At the outset it should be pointed out that the decree provided for monthly spousal support for a three-year period only.
It is my view that the trial judge did have authority to make this provision a part of the decree under the terms of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of GwinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Remington v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- McLaughlin v. McLaughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1969