Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re the Marriage of Slauson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 1977No. 423-487, CA 6864Published

1Concurrence

THORNTON, J.,

specially concurring.

While I concur in the result reached by the majority, I do not concur in that portion of the opinion which invalidates the proviso in the trial court’s decree authorizing the wife to request a review of the provision regarding spousal support "at any time without a necessity of showing a substantial change of circumstances.”

At the outset it should be pointed out that the decree provided for monthly spousal support for a three-year period only.

It is my view that the trial judge did have authority to make this provision a part of the decree under the terms of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of GwinnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of KentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Remington v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API