Legal Opinion
McComb v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 25, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 97-0139PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
The Court accepted jurisdiction in this special action by order on June 10, 1997, with a decision to follow. This is that decision.
The superior court invalidated Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 15-431 in its entirety, removed the newly seated members of the board of the Dysart Unified School District (“the district”), and continued the prior incumbents’ terms pending a November 1997 special election. We grant partial relief from the trial court’s ruling.
The facts, stated briefly, are as follows. In June 1996, the district’s board voted to change…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ross v. State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Prutch v. Town of QuartzsiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Mayer Unified School District v. WinklemanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.