Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided November 25, 2024No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO vs. MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND STOP BUERGOFOL FROM FILING OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS UNTIL THE CLOSE OF DISCOVERY Defendant. Defendant, Omega, moves the court to amend its scheduling order to incorporate additional discovery protocols and bar plaintiff, Buergofol, from filing dispositive motions until after the close of discovery. Docket 393. Buergofol opposes the motions. Docket 408. I. Proposed Discovery Procedures Omega’s proposed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implant Recipients v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Gregory L. Iverson v. Johnson Gas Appliance Co., an Iowa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Hamilton v. Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- National Surety Corp. v. Dustex Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013