Legal Opinion
Gelston v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John A. Milano, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners Edna and Robert Gelston seek the following relief:(1) That the court declare CPLR 213-a and section 46 of the Laws of 1997 (ch 116) unconstitutional, and, therefore, the manner in which the Commissioner of respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) rendered the order of January 15, 1998 to be arbitrary and capricious, and unreasonable; (2) that the court issue an order directing the DHCR to decide the November 21, 1997 hardship application by a date certain, or, in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Versailles Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- I. L. F. Y. Co. v. City Rent & Rehabilitation AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- R & G Outfitters, Inc. v. BouchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Matter of Eagan v. LivotiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rockaway One Co. v. WigginsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004