Legal Opinion

Suarez v. EDGEHILL

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 14, 2009No. 3D08-2966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

The question in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly disposed of the surplus existing after a foreclosure sale. We conclude that the trial court was correct.

Defendant-appellee Sheila Edgehill owned a home on which there were two mortgages, the first mortgage being held by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and the second mortgage being held by plaintiff-appellant Richard Suarez. After the death of Ms. Edgehill’s husband, the mortgages went into default.

In January 2008, Wells Fargo filed a foreclosure action in which Mr. Suarez and Ms. Edgehill were defendants. Wells Fargo filed its notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dade Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBASupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Town of Lake Park v. GrimesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atwater v. City of Cape CoralDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  2. Lawrence T. Reid, Jr. v. Amerifund Equity GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  3. Lawrence T. Reid, Jr. v. Amerifund Equity GroupDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API