Legal Opinion
Painten v. Pilie
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 3, 1941No. 36340PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Justice.
The plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. William R. Painten, prosecuted this appeal from an order rendered by the District Court approving and homologating the procés verbal and report of Mr. E. L. Eustis, Civil Engineer and Surveyor, who was appointed by the court to make a survey and fix the boundary lines of certain contiguous real property of which the plaintiffs and the defendant are adjoining proprietors.
The defendant, Marion V. Pilie, has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order of homologation is an interlocutory order from which an appeal may not be taken.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNair v. GourrierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
- Griffing v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- McCarty v. ZacharieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
- Betterton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
- Thompson v. ParrentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Alfonso v. RuizLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Succession of Willis v. WillisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Naquin v. NaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Naquin v. NaquinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962