Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Grandy's, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1992No. 17804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

In this action, Paula Blankenship alleges that a “Transcript of Compromise Settlement”, by mistake, incorrectly designates the “Employer”. By this action, filed in the Circuit Court of Jasper County, she seeks to modify the Transcript of Compromise Settlement to correctly designate another corporation as the Employer. The trial court dismissed her petition with prejudice for the reason it failed to state a cause of action. Blankenship appeals.

Blankenship’s point on appeal is that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition because it

“stated a cause of action for equitable…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Allen v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Daffin v. DaffinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Schnabel v. Taft Broadcasting Company, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Nappier v. KincadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SeiterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. HowardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Stevens v. Citizens Memorial Healthcare FoundationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Dobson v. Riedel Survey & Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Meek v. Pizza InnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API