Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 28, 1992No. 90-1154PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse and remand for a new trial based on the authority of Wright v. State, 592 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). We certify the following question, as stated in Jefferson v. State, 584 So.2d 123 (Fla. 4th *1128DCA 1991), and Wright, as one of great public importance:

WHERE THE TRIAL COURT FINDS THAT A PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE IS BASED UPON RACIAL BIAS, IS THE SOLE REMEDY T,0 DISMISS THE JURY POOL AND START VOIR DIRE OVER WITH A NEW JURY POOL, OR MAY THE TRIAL COURT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO DENY THE PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE IF IT CURES THE DISCRIMINATORY TAINT; FOR EXAMPLE, MUST THE JURY PANEL BE…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Jefferson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API