Sporkin v. MacBride
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
On May 29, 1928, defendant filed his appear from the judgment of a magistrate in Philadelphia. On June 12th following, the attorney for the plaintiff entered a general appearance and presented a petition to show cause, why the appeal should not be stricken off, alleging that no notice of the filing of the appeal was sent to him or to the plaintiff within 72 hours as required by the rules of the Municipal Court, nor received by him or his client. The defendant filed an answer in which he alleged that he had sent a notice by hi's attorney by regular mail to plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dewart v. PurdySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- MacGeorge v. Chemical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Kane & Elk Railroad v. Pittsburgh & Western R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Sherer v. Easton BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Taylor v. McCaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schenck v. GoodmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Porter v. ChapmanPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1940
- Derringer v. DerringerPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1940
- Karper v. Koser, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1930
- Kibe v. Sentz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.