Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Algimantas Dailide,defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2000No. 97-3340Published

1DissentBoggs, Circuit Judge

PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

The district court granted summary judgment to the government on two grounds. I would reverse the district court because I believe that neither ground can be supported as a matter of law, and I explain why in my opinion below. In my dissent, I refer to Judge Clay’s opinion as being that of “the court” though it is so only in its conclusion of affirmance and to the extent of Judge Nelson’s concurrence. Judge Nelson’s concurrence, based on the minimum ground that Dailide’s participation, in whatever capacity, in the arrest of two Jews fleeing the Vilnius ghetto is sufficient…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Fedorenko v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Knauer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. BalsysSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API