Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lanthrip v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 27, 2002No. 2000276Published

1DissentYates, Presiding Judge

Because I believe that Lanthrip suffered a loss of earning capacity, I must respectfully dissent from the main opinion.

At the time of her injury, Lanthrip was working three jobs: she worked as a deli stocker at Wal-Mart, as a school bus driver, and as a security guard at Raytheon for Security Engineers. Following surgery on her left foot, Lanthrip returned to work at all three jobs. However, she was forced to leave her security-guard position because the injury to her foot prevented her from fulfilling the requirements of that job.

Lanthrip’s post-injury work at Wal-Mart was in a different…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Discovery Zone v. WatersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte FryfogleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Smither v. International Paper Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  4. Johnson v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. UptainCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API