Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Wright

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1991No. 90-1146PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and recommendations of the board, but modify the sanction based on information received at oral argument that respondent is afflicted with alcohol addiction. Accordingly, we suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state for two years, but stay eighteen months of that suspension and place respondent on probation on condition that he receive treatment for his alcohol addiction and that the probation be supervised and monitored by relator as provided in Gov. Bar R. V(23). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, H.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API