Legal Opinion

(PC) Kulp v. Stanislaus County Sheriff Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 28, 2022No. 1:22-cv-00829Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY JAMES KULP, No. 1:22-cv-00829-ADA-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART AND 14 STANISLAUS CNTY. SHERIFF DEPT., ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND et al., 15 (ECF No. 8) Defendants. 16 THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Anthony James Kulp is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302, this matter was assigned to a United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Danica Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API